Optimization of Railway Line Maintenance in West Sumatra: A Literatur Review
Keywords:
maintenance, railway, LCCAbstract
This study aims to analyze the maintenance strategy of railway lines in West Sumatra using the Life Cycle Cost (LCC) approach to determine the most economically efficient and sustainable maintenance option. The main issues raised are the high cost of reactive maintenance and the risk of operational disruption due to track damage. The research method involved collecting construction, operational, and maintenance cost data from railway operators, as well as LCC-based scenario simulations to compare preventive and reactive maintenance strategies. The results of the analysis show that the preventive maintenance strategy results in lower total life cycle costs, compared to the reactive strategy. In addition, the preventive strategy also supports operational sustainability by minimizing the risk of service disruption and improving user safety. SWOT analysis shows that LCC implementation has great potential to improve budget efficiency and support local economic growth, although challenges such as data limitations and natural disaster risks need to be mitigated. This research concludes that an LCC-based approach can be the basis for designing more effective, efficient and sustainable railway maintenance policies. Recommendations include prioritizing preventive maintenance, using monitoring technology, and strengthening supporting policies.
References
Ahuja, H., & Mital, M. (2014). Life cycle costing in railways: A case study of infrastructure maintenance. International Journal of Rail Transport, 2(3), 131-145.
Bower, D., & Turner, P. (2018). Comparative cost analysis of railway maintenance strategies: A life cycle cost approach. Journal of Transport Engineering, 144(7), 04018045.
Daziano, R., & Prat, P. (2016). Optimal maintenance strategies for infrastructure: A life-cycle cost model approach. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 89, 44-57.
Goh, M., & Chia, H. (2017). Evaluating railway track maintenance strategies: A life cycle cost approach. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 23(2), 04017012.
Guo, L., & Zheng, S. (2019). Life cycle cost analysis for railway track design and maintenance. International Journal of Railway Technology, 8(1), 23-40.
Hartman, D., & Klein, P. (2020). Impact of preventive maintenance on railway track life cycle costs. Transportation Research Record, 2674(1), 16-25.
Ishii, Y., & Fujimoto, T. (2018). Maintenance cost optimization for railway systems using life cycle cost (LCC) analysis. Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management, 8(4), 182-194.
Li, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2017). A case study on the life cycle cost optimization of railway track maintenance. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 23(4), 536-549.
Lütke, K., & Meyer, M. (2015). Managing the life cycle of railway assets: Case studies on cost-effective strategies. Transport Policy, 43, 54-63.
Mulder, R., & Visser, A. (2016). Evaluating the economic efficiency of railway track maintenance: A life cycle costing approach. Railway Engineering Science, 28(3), 357-368.
Smith, S., & Brown, J. (2019). Optimizing railway track maintenance strategies using life cycle cost analysis. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport, 172(2), 77-86.
Steed, S., & Hawkins, P. (2017). The role of life cycle cost analysis in improving infrastructure maintenance. Engineering Economics, 58(2), 230-240.
Turner, P., & Young, D. (2018). Sustainable railway maintenance strategies: Integrating life cycle cost and environmental factors. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 63, 216-225.
Van Haren, R., & Mitchell, L. (2014). Life cycle assessment and cost in railway infrastructure: An integrated approach. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 140(5), 04014014.
Zhang, Q., & Zhou, Y. (2020). A framework for life cycle cost-based evaluation of railway infrastructure maintenance. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 26(3), 04020025.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The International Conferences on Engineering Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.