Experimental Investigation of Fused Deposition Modelling 3D Printing Process on Propeller Blade Roughness Using PLA+
Keywords:
FDM 3D Printing, PLA, Roughness, Layer Thickness, CutoffAbstract
The manufacturing process now emphasizes producing high-quality products. Additive manufacturing, particularly Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), fulfills these demands by enabling precise fabrication through filament layer extrusion. This study investigates the effects of process parameters, specifically layer thickness and infill density, on the surface roughness of PLA+ polymer material using FDM. Surface orientation plays a crucial role in determining the quality of printed components, such as propeller blades with complex geometries. Surface roughness was analyzed using the Gaussian Filter method with cutoffs of 800 µm and 25 µm at different surface points, namely top and bottom. The results indicate that layer thickness significantly impacts surface roughness. A layer thickness of 0.1 mm yielded smoother surfaces compared to 0.3 mm, as the smaller layer height reduces the formation of uneven surface lines and roughness. The higher layer thickness (0.3 mm) increased the distance between layers, resulting in a rougher texture. In conclusion, optimizing layer thickness, particularly at 0.1 mm, improves surface quality. These findings highlight the importance of parameter control in achieving high-quality 3D printed components, especially for intricate geometries like propeller blades.
References
Ahn, Daekeon, Jin Hwe Kweon, Soonman Kwon, Jungil Song, and Seokhee Lee. 2009. Representation of Surface Roughness in Fused Deposition Modeling. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 209(15–16):5593–5600. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.05.016.
Alsoufi, Mohammad S., and Abdulrhman E. Elsayed. 2017. How Surface Roughness Performance of Printed Parts Manufactured by Desktop FDM 3D Printer with PLA+ Is Influenced by Measuring Direction. American Journal of Mechanical Engineering 5(5):211–22. doi: 10.12691/ajme-5-5-4.
Alsoufi, Mohammad S., and Abdulrhman E. Elsayed. 2018. Surface Roughness Quality and Dimensional Accuracy—A Comprehensive Analysis of 100% Infill Printed Parts Fabricated by a Personal/Desktop Cost-Effective FDM 3D Printer. Materials Sciences and Applications 09(01):11–40. doi: 10.4236/msa.2018.91002.
Anon. n.d.-a. ISO 4288:1996(En), Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) — Surface Texture: Profile Method — Rules and Procedures for the Assessment of Surface Texture. Retrieved June 8, 2023.
Anon. n.d.-b. Shenzhen Esun Industrial Co., Ltd. - PLA, ABS. Retrieved January 22, 2022 (https://esun.en.alibaba.com/).
Aslani, Kyriaki Evangelia, Dimitrios Chaidas, John Kechagias, Panagiotis Kyratsis, and Konstantinos Salonitis. 2020. Quality Performance Evaluation of Thinwalled PLA 3D Printed Parts Using the Taguchi Method and Grey Relational Analysis. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing 4(2):47. doi: 10.3390/jmmp4020047.
Backeris, Peter, and Joseph Borrello. 2017. Rapid Prototyping Technologies. Pp. 41–49 in Rapid Prototyping in Cardiac Disease: 3D Printing the Heart. Springer International Publishing.
Barreno-Avila, A. F., M. Monar-Naranjo, and E. M. Barreno-Avila. 2021. Fusion Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D Printing Parameters Correlation: An Analysis of Different Polymers Surface Roughness. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1173(1):012071. doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/1173/1/012071.
Buj-Corral, Irene, Ali Bagheri, and Maurici Sivatte-Adroer. 2021. Effect of Printing Parameters on Dimensional Error, Surface Roughness and Porosity of FFF Printed Parts with Grid Structure. Polymers 13(8). doi: 10.3390/polym13081213.
Buj-Corral, Irene, Xavier Sánchez-Casas, and Carmelo J. Luis-Pérez. 2021. Analysis of Am Parameters on Surface Roughness Obtained in Pla Parts Printed with Fff Technology. Polymers 13(14). doi: 10.3390/polym13142384.
Chaidas, D., K. Kitsakis, J. Kechagias, and S. Maropoulos. 2016. The Impact of Temperature Changing on Surface Roughness of FFF Process. in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Vol. 161. Institute of Physics Publishing.
Chen, Lan, and Xinzhou Zhang. 2019. Modification the Surface Quality and Mechanical Properties by Laser Polishing of Al/PLA Part Manufactured by Fused Deposition Modeling. Applied Surface Science 492:765–75. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.252.
Chohan, Jasgurpreet Singh, Rupinder Singh, and Kamaljit Singh Boparai. 2016. Mathematical Modelling of Surface Roughness for Vapour Processing of ABS Parts Fabricated with Fused Deposition Modelling. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 24:161–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.09.002.
Doil, Richard C., and Andrew Kusiak. 1994. Handbook of Design, Manufacturing and Automation. A Wiley-Interscience Publication.
Dwiyati, S. T., A. Kholil, R. Riyadi, and S. E. Putra. 2019. Influence of Layer Thickness and 3D Printing Direction on Tensile Properties of ABS Material. in Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Vol. 1402. IOP Publishing Ltd.
Eladl, Abdelkhalik, Rania Mostafa, Aminul Islam, Dario Loaldi, Hassan Soltan, Hans N. Hansen, and Guido Tosello. 2018. Effect of Process Parameters on Flow Length and Flash Formation in Injection Moulding of High Aspect Ratio Polymeric Micro Features. Micromachines 9(2). doi: 10.3390/mi9020058.
Galantucci, L. M., F. Lavecchia, and G. Percoco. 2009. Experimental Study Aiming to Enhance the Surface Finish of Fused Deposition Modeled Parts. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 58(1):189–92. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.071.
Galeta, Tomislav, Pero Raos, Josip Stojšić, and Ivana Pakši. 2016. Influence of Structure on Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Objects. Pp. 100–104 in Procedia Engineering. Vol. 149. Elsevier Ltd.
Galetto, Maurizio, Elisa Verna, and Gianfranco Genta. 2021. Effect of Process Parameters on Parts Quality and Process Efficiency of Fused Deposition Modeling. Computers and Industrial Engineering 156. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107238.
Gibson, Ian, David Rosen, and Brent Stucker. 2015. Introduction and Basic Principles. Pp. 1–18 in Additive Manufacturing Technologies. Springer New York.
Hartcher-O’Brien, Jess, Jeremy Evers, and Erik Tempelman. 2019. Surface Roughness of 3D Printed Materials: Comparing Physical Measurements and Human Perception. Materials Today Communications 19:300–305. doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.01.008.
Jaisingh Sheoran, Ankita, and Harish Kumar. 2020. Fused Deposition Modeling Process Parameters Optimization and Effect on Mechanical Properties and Part Quality: Review and Reflection on Present Research. Pp. 1659–72 in Materials Today: Proceedings. Vol. 21. Elsevier Ltd.
Jang, Sungwoo, Andrew Boddorff, Dong June Jang, Jacob Lloyd, Karla Wagner, Naresh Thadhani, and Blair Brettmann. 2021. Effect of Material Extrusion Process Parameters on Filament Geometry and Inter-Filament Voids in as-Fabricated High Solids Loaded Polymer Composites. Additive Manufacturing 47. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102313.
Lavecchia, Fulvio, Maria Grazia Guerra, and Luigi Maria Galantucci. 2022. Chemical Vapor Treatment to Improve Surface Finish of 3D Printed Polylactic Acid (PLA) Parts Realized by Fused Filament Fabrication. Progress in Additive Manufacturing 7(1):65–75. doi: 10.1007/s40964-021-00213-2.
Lengua, Carlos A. Gonzalez. 2017. History of Rapid Prototyping. Pp. 3–7 in Rapid Prototyping in Cardiac Disease: 3D Printing the Heart. Springer International Publishing.
Li, Zhixiong, Ziyang Zhang, Junchuan Shi, and Dazhong Wu. 2019. Prediction of Surface Roughness in Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing with Machine Learning. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 57:488–95. doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2019.01.004.
Mendricky, Radomir, and Daniel Fris. 2020. Analysis of the Accuracy and the Surface Roughness of Fdm/Fff Technology and Optimisation of Process Parameters. Tehnicki Vjesnik 27(4):1166–73. doi: 10.17559/TV-20190320142210.
Ngo, Tuan D., Alireza Kashani, Gabriele Imbalzano, Kate T. Q. Nguyen, and David Hui. 2018. Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing): A Review of Materials, Methods, Applications and Challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering 143:172–96.
Peterson, Amy M. 2019. Review of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene in Fused Filament Fabrication: A Plastics Engineering-Focused Perspective. Additive Manufacturing 27:363–71.
Radhwan, H., Z. Shayfull, S. M. Nasir, Abdellah El Hadj Abdellah, and A. R. Irfan. 2020. Optimization Parameter Effects on the Quality Surface Finish of 3D-Printing Process Using Taguchi Method. in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Vol. 864. IOP Publishing Ltd.
Rayegani, Farzad, and Godfrey C. Onwubolu. 2014. Fused Deposition Modelling (Fdm) Process Parameter Prediction and Optimization Using Group Method for Data Handling (Gmdh) and Differential Evolution (De). International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 73(1–4):509–19. doi: 10.1007/s00170-014-5835-2.
Sammaiah, Pulla, K. Rushmamanisha, N. Praveenadevi, and I. Rajasri Reddy. 2020. The Influence of Process Parameters on the Surface Roughness of the 3d Printed Part in FDM Process. in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Vol. 981. IOP Publishing Ltd.
Samykano, M., S. K. Selvamani, K. Kadirgama, W. K. Ngui, G. Kanagaraj, and K. Sudhakar. 2019. Mechanical Property of FDM Printed ABS: Influence of Printing Parameters. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 102(9–12):2779–96. doi: 10.1007/s00170-019-03313-0.
Shirmohammadi, Mohammad, Saeid Jafarzadeh Goushchi, and Peyman Mashhadi Keshtiban. 2021. Optimization of 3D Printing Process Parameters to Minimize Surface Roughness with Hybrid Artificial Neural Network Model and Particle Swarm Algorithm. Progress in Additive Manufacturing 6(2):199–215. doi: 10.1007/s40964-021-00166-6.
Suteja, T. J., and A. Soesanti. 2020. Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Polylactic Acid Product for Various Infill Design Parameters: A Review. in Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Vol. 1569. Institute of Physics Publishing.
Taşcıoğlu, Emre, Özhan Kıtay, Ali Özkan Keskin, and Yusuf Kaynak. 2022. Effect of Printing Parameters and Post-Process on Surface Roughness and Dimensional Deviation of PLA Parts Fabricated by Extrusion-Based 3D Printing. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 44(4). doi: 10.1007/s40430-022-03429-7.
Townsend, A., N. Senin, L. Blunt, R. K. Leach, and J. S. Taylor. 2016. Surface Texture Metrology for Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review. Precision Engineering 46:34–47.
Vidakis, Nectarios, Constantine David, Markos Petousis, Dimitrios Sagris, Nikolaos Mountakis, and Amalia Moutsopoulou. 2022. The Effect of Six Key Process Control Parameters on the Surface Roughness, Dimensional Accuracy, and Porosity in Material Extrusion 3D Printing of Polylactic Acid: Prediction Models and Optimization Supported by Robust Design Analysis. Advances in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 5. doi: 10.1016/j.aime.2022.100104.
Vyavahare, Swapnil, Shailendra Kumar, and Deepak Panghal. 2020. Experimental Study of Surface Roughness, Dimensional Accuracy and Time of Fabrication of Parts Produced by Fused Deposition Modelling. Rapid Prototyping Journal 26(9):1535–54. doi: 10.1108/RPJ-12-2019-0315.
Wang, Peng, Bin Zou, and Shouling Ding. 2019. Modeling of Surface Roughness Based on Heat Transfer Considering Diffusion among Deposition Filaments for FDM 3D Printing Heat-Resistant Resin. Applied Thermal Engineering 161. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114064.
Webbe Kerekes, Tomas, Hyoungjun Lim, Woong Yeol Joe, and Gun Jin Yun. 2019. Characterization of Process–Deformation/Damage Property Relationship of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D-Printed Specimens. Additive Manufacturing 25:532–44. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.008.
Weng, Zixiang, Jianlei Wang, T. Senthil, and Lixin Wu. 2016. Mechanical and Thermal Properties of ABS/Montmorillonite Nanocomposites for Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printing. Materials and Design 102:276–83. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.045.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The International Conferences on Engineering Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
