Analisis Kesesuaian Teknologi ChatGPT terhadap Aktivitas Perkuliahan Mahasiswa Menggunakan Model Task–Technology Fit (TTF)

Muhammad Arief Maulana; Kurniabudi Kurniabudi; Jasmir Jasmir

doi:10.61132/prosemnasproit.v2i2.119

Authors

Muhammad Arief Maulana Universitas Dinamika Bangsa
Kurniabudi Kurniabudi Universitas Dinamika Bangsa
Jasmir Jasmir Universitas Dinamika Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/prosemnasproit.v2i2.119

Keywords:

ChatGPT, Pendidikan Tinggi, Task–Technology Fit, Pemanfaatan Teknologi, Kinerja Mahasiswa

Abstract

The rapid development of artificial intelligence, particularly ChatGPT, has created new opportunities to support students’ academic activities in higher education. However, its utilization needs to be evaluated in terms of the alignment between academic task characteristics and technological capabilities to ensure optimal outcomes. This study aims to examine the feasibility of using ChatGPT in students’ academic activities by applying the Task–Technology Fit (TTF) model. This research employed a quantitative approach using Structural Equation Modeling based on Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS). Data were collected through questionnaires distributed to university students and analyzed using SmartPLS 4 software. The variables examined included Task Characteristics, Technology Characteristics, Task–Technology Fit, Performance Impact, and Utilization. The results indicate that Task Characteristics and Technology Characteristics have a positive and significant effect on Task–Technology Fit. Furthermore, Task–Technology Fit significantly influences Performance Impact and Utilization. Performance Impact also shows a positive and significant effect on the utilization of ChatGPT by students. These findings suggest that the alignment between academic task requirements and the capabilities of ChatGPT plays a crucial role in improving students’ performance and encouraging sustained technology use. The implications of this study highlight the importance of selective and purposeful use of ChatGPT in higher education and provide a reference for higher education institutions in formulating policies related to the ethical and effective integration of artificial intelligence technologies as learning support tools.

References

Alamri, M. M., Almaiah, M. A., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2020). The Role of Compatibility and Task-Technology Fit (TTF): On Social Networking Applications (SNAs) Usage as Sustainability in Higher Education. IEEE Access, 8, 161668–161681. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3021944

Aldoseri, A., Al-Khalifa, K. N., & Hamouda, A. M. (2024). AI-Powered Innovation in Digital Transformation: Key Pillars and Industry Impact. Sustainability, 16(5), 1790. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051790

Bolatan, G. I. S., Giadedi, A., & Daim, T. U. (2024). Exploring Acquiring Technologies: Adoption, Adaptation, and Knowledge Management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 1950–1958. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3168901

Brar, P. S., Shah, B., Singh, J., Ali, F., & Kwak, D. (2022). Using Modified Technology Acceptance Model to Evaluate the Adoption of a Proposed IoT-Based Indoor Disaster Management Software Tool by Rescue Workers. Sensors, 22(5), 1866. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22051866

Chavarnakul, T., Lin, Y.-C., Khan, A., & Chen, S.-C. (2024). Exploring the Determinants and Consequences of Task-Technology Fit: A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling Perspective. Emerging Science Journal, 8(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2024-08-01-06

Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task–technology fit constructs. Information & Management, 36(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00101-3

Dr. Aris Try Andreas Putra. (2025). METODOLODI PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF DAN KUALITATIF (Teoretis & Praktis). AMERTA MEDIA.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

He, S., Yang, F., Zuo, J., & Lin, Z. (2023). ChatGPT for scientific paper writing—promises and perils. The Innovation, 4(6), 100524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100524

Hollar, D. W. (2018). The Method of Path Coefficients. In Trajectory Analysis in Health Care (pp. 49–72). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59626-6_5

Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2023). Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: A systematic review of the literature. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep464. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13605

Kahraman, F., Aktas, A., Bayrakceken, S., Çakar, T., Tarcan, H. S., Bayram, B., Durak, B., & Ulman, Y. I. (2024). Physicians’ ethical concerns about artificial intelligence in medicine: a qualitative study: “The final decision should rest with a human.” Frontiers in Public Health, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1428396

Kayalı, B., Yavuz, M., Balat, Ş., & Çalışan, M. (2023). Investigation of student experiences with ChatGPT-supported online learning applications in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8915

Ley, T., Tammets, K., Sarmiento-Márquez, E. M., Leoste, J., Hallik, M., & Poom-Valickis, K. (2022). Adopting technology in schools: modelling, measuring and supporting knowledge appropriation. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 548–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1937113

SASIREKHA, DR. K. (2024). Influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools on the Research Capabilities of College Students. INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 08(10), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM37999

Strielkowski, W., Grebennikova, V., Lisovskiy, A., Rakhimova, G., & Vasileva, T. (2025). AI ‐driven adaptive learning for sustainable educational transformation. Sustainable Development, 33(2), 1921–1947. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3221

Sun, G. H., & Hoelscher, S. H. (2023). The ChatGPT Storm and What Faculty Can Do. Nurse Educator. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001390

Thondebhavi Subbaramaiah, M., & Shanthanna, H. (2023). ChatGPT in the field of scientific publication – Are we ready for it? Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 67(5), 407–408. https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_294_23

TomassMHultt, G. (n.d.). Classroom Companion: Business Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R AAWorkbook. http://www.

Wu, T., He, S., Liu, J., Sun, S., Liu, K., Han, Q.-L., & Tang, Y. (2023). A Brief Overview of ChatGPT: The History, Status Quo and Potential Future Development. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 10(5), 1122–1136. https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2023.123618

Yarsasi, S., Tahyudin, I., & Hariguna, T. (2025). Analisis Validitas dan Reliabilitas Kuesioner dengan Metode Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling pada Aplikasi SMARTPLS. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Teknologi Indonesia, 5(7), 1905–1913. https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jpti.885