Faktor Utama Penghambat Penerapan Manajemen Risiko Biaya pada Pelaksanaan Proyek Konstruksi Gedung Bertingkat di Surabaya dengan Menggunakan Metode AHP Fuzzy

Tia Herlina Sugiharto; Michella Beatrix

doi:10.61132/prosemnasproit.v2i2.44

Authors

Tia Herlina Sugiharto Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Michella Beatrix Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/prosemnasproit.v2i2.44

Keywords:

Construction projects, Cost risk, Fuzzy AHP, Risk management, Surabaya City

Abstract

The implementation of risk management is an important method that is carried out in order to identify risk factors that may arise during the implementation of the project. However, the implementation of risk management still faces some obstacles in its implementation. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the barriers to the implementation of risk management in construction projects in Surabaya. A total of 80 respondents filled out questionnaires from construction service providers including contractors and consultants. Respondents involved include professional experts such as Project Managers, Site engineers, Site managers, implementers, estimators, General Managers and Company Directors. Data processing using fuzzy AHP method as a data processing tool and decision making. The results of the study revealed that the main factors that can hinder the implementation of cost risk management are inaccurate cost estimates (Y4) with the highest weight of 0.433, lack of quality Control (Qc) supervision criteria (Y5) is ranked second with a weight of 0.288, poor coordination between stakeholders (owner,contractor and consultant) (Y1) is ranked third with a weight of 0.274, lack of risk management training (Y3) is ranked fourth with a weight of 0.005, and some, old age) (Y2), the work can not be done according to the work drawings (Y6), limited skilled human resources (Y7), materials not according to specifications (Y8), improper initial cost estimation (Y9), late progressive payment from the owner (Y10) ranked fifth jointly because it has an equivalent weight value of 0.These findings conclude that accurate cost estimation (Y4) is very important in construction projects because it becomes the main basis in budget planning, decision making, and risk management.

References

Afiq, M. (2021). Manajemen risiko pada proyek pembangunan gedung asrama mahasiswa UIN Walisongo tahun 2021. Akselerasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.37058/aks.v3i1.3561

Al, A., Aflahin, A. D., Ivan, M., Fathoni, A., Cindrabumi, F., Studi, P., Matematika, P., Keguruan, F., Pendidikan, I., Ulama, N., & Giri, S. (2023). Penerapan sistem pendukung keputusan (SPK) dengan menggunakan metode Fuzzy AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) sebagai penentuan penerima beasiswa PIP. Lingkar: Jurnal Ilmiah, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.46306/lb.v4i3

Apriani, A., Dharma, I. G. D. S., Mayadi, M., & Dasriani, N. G. A. (2022). Sistem pendukung keputusan seleksi penerimaan karyawan dengan metode AHP dan pembobotan Fuzzy. Jurnal Bumigora Information Technology (BITE), 4(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.30812/bite.v4i1.1915

Chattapadhyay, D. B., Putta, J., & Rama Mohan Rao, P. (2021). Risk identification, assessments, and prediction for mega construction projects: A risk prediction paradigm based on cross analytical-machine learning model. Buildings, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11040172

Fatimah, A., Hayati, K., & Akmal, B. (2021). Identifikasi manajemen risiko proyek konstruksi gedung di Provinsi Aceh. Bulletin of Civil Engineering, 1(2), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.18196/bce.v1i2.12402

Hafiz Trisaputra, M., & Muzakir, A. (2021). Implementasi metode Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP) untuk penentuan kelas unggulan di SMPN 2 Tanjung Lago. Jurnal Pengembangan Sistem Informasi dan Informatika, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.47747/jpsii.v2i2.550

Harahap, A. R., Simbolon, N. H. M., Agata, R. A., & Sunarsih, S. (2022). Metode Fuzzy AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) untuk pemilihan metode pembelajaran demi menunjang pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Sains dan Edukasi Sains, 5(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.24246/juses.v5i1p9-17

Honesti, L., & Ramadhan, J. (2021). Identifikasi manajemen risiko kinerja biaya pada proyek konstruksi gedung di Provinsi Sumatra Barat (dilihat dari sudut pandang kontraktor). Rang Teknik Journal, 4(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.31869/rtj.v4i1.2030

Irianto, G., & Amirya, M. (2024). Kendala dan strategi implementasi manajemen risiko di pemerintah daerah Indonesia. Ekuitas: Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 12(2), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.23887/ekuitas.v12i2.84241

Liou, J. J. H., & Chuang, M.-L. (2008). Hybrid MCDM model for evaluating the corporate image of the airline industry. International Journal of Applied Management Science.

Mahyuddin, R. (2023). Manajemen proyek konstruksi. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis.

Pinandito, S., Talangkas, T., & Pulansari, F. (2021). Pemilihan supplier semen pada CV. Rizki Jaya Abadi di Kabupaten Mojokerto menggunakan metode Fuzzy AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process). Tekmapro: Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.33005/tekmapro.v16i2.202

Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th ed.). Newtown Square, Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute.

Priangga, P. (2019). Penerapan metode perbandingan berpasangan (Pairwise Comparisons) dalam menentukan keputusan pemberian kredit usaha rakyat (Studi kasus: Bank Bukopin) (Master’s thesis, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya). https://repository.its.ac.id/60242/

Putu, N., Yuliana, I., Sri, N. K., & Yuni, E. (2024). Manajemen risiko estimasi biaya pada tahap perencanaan proyek konstruksi (Risk management for cost estimation at the planning stage of construction projects). Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Rekayasa, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.30630/jipr.19.2.360

Rinto Sugiharto. (2020). Analisis faktor-faktor dominan manajemen risiko terhadap kinerja keuangan proyek tahap konstruksi. Teslink: Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.52005/teslink.v2i2.41

Romdona, S., Senja Junista, S., & Gunawan, A. (2025). Teknik pengumpulan data: Observasi, wawancara dan kuesioner. Jurnal Teknologi, Aplikasi, dan Cendekia Elektro, 3(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.61787/taceee75

Saktia Ardiantono, D., Negoro, N. P., Wira Trispantia, A., Al Mustofa, M. U., & Bramanti, G. W. (2020). Risk analysis of Tower A development in Surabaya “X” project. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 131, 68–75. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200410.014

Silalahi, Y. I., Masthura, L., & Fahriana, N. (2023). Analisis faktor-faktor penentu keberhasilan proyek konstruksi berdasarkan mutu, biaya dan waktu. Jurnal Komposit, 7(2), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.32832/komposit.v7i2.14240

Subhaktiyasa, P. G. (2024). Menentukan populasi dan sampel: Pendekatan metodologi penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 9(4), 2721–2731. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v9i4.2657

Taras Bulba, A., Rauzana, A., & Kurniawan, I. (2022). Identifikasi risiko biaya pelaksanaan proyek konstruksi gedung bagi perusahaan kontraktor. Jurnal Teknik Sipil Universitas Teuku Umar, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.35308/jts-utu.v8i2.6284

Tayyab, M., Furkhan, M., Rizwan, M., Jameel, M., & Chadee, A. (2023). A study on factors influencing cost overrun in high-rise building construction across India. Journal of Smart Buildings and Construction Technology, 5(1), 52–83. https://doi.org/10.30564/jsbct.v5i1.5489

Yousri, E., Sayed, A. E. B., Farag, M. A. M., & Abdelalim, A. M. (2023). Risk identification of building construction projects in Egypt. Buildings, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13041084