Implementasi MADM Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Kandidat Magang Social Media Specialist Menggunakan AHP-TOPSIS Pada PT.XYZ

Farras Hafish Zidane; Rizka Hadiwiyanti; Iqbal Ramadhani Mukhlis

doi:10.61132/prosemnasproit.v2i2.56

Authors

Farras Hafish Zidane Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran
Rizka Hadiwiyanti Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran
Iqbal Ramadhani Mukhlis Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/prosemnasproit.v2i2.56

Keywords:

AHP, Decision Support System, MADM, Recruitment, TOPSIS

Abstract

This research aims to implement a Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) approach using the AHP–TOPSIS method to assist PT. XYZ in selecting the most suitable intern candidate for the Social Media Specialist position. The increasing number of applicants each year makes the selection process more complex, requiring a systematic and data-driven decision support system. AHP was used to determine the priority weights of five main criteria—Interview, Experience, Portfolio, Skill, and Achievement—along with their subcriteria. All pairwise comparison matrices met the consistency requirements, indicating valid weights. The TOPSIS method was then applied to calculate the preference scores of ten candidate alternatives based on the weighted normalized decision matrix, ideal solutions, and distance measures. The results show that candidate A3 achieved the highest preference score (0.9422), followed by A7 and A8, making them the top recommended candidates. This study demonstrates that integrating AHP and TOPSIS effectively supports companies in conducting objective, efficient, and accurate recruitment decision-making processes.

References

Appel, G., Grewal, L., Hadi, R., & Stephen, A. T. (2020). The future of social media in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00695-1

Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2014). Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice (13. ed). Kogan Page.

Dessler, G. (2020). Human Resource Management (16th ed.). Pearson.

Fachrurozi, A. (2024, December 19). 6M Dalam Berwirausaha. 6M Dalam Berwirausaha. https://news.bsi.ac.id/2022/09/30/6m-dalam-berwirausaha/

Franek, J., & Kashi, K. (2014). A Review and Critique of MADM Methods and Applications in Business and Management. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v6i2.254

Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, S0957417411006701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143

Kamila, S., Hadiwiyanti, R., & Satria Yudha Kartika, D. (2024). IMPLEMENTASI METODE AHP-SAW DALAM SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PENENTUAN PERWAKILAN OLIMPIADE AKADEMIK. JATI (Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknik Informatika), 8(4), 7322–7329. https://doi.org/10.36040/jati.v8i4.10189

Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1

Putra, B. R., & Diana, A. (2022). RANCANG BANGUN SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PEMILIHAN KARYAWAN TERBAIK DENGAN METODE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) PADA RUMAH MAKAN CIGANEA PUSAT. RADIAL : Jurnal Peradaban Sains, Rekayasa dan Teknologi, 9(2), 250–264. https://doi.org/10.37971/radial.v9i2.242

Putra, F., & Novita, D. (2023). Implementasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Karyawan Terbaik Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS. MDP Student Conference, 2(1), 501–509. https://doi.org/10.35957/mdp-sc.v2i1.4426

Roszkowska, E. (n.d.). MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING MODELS BY APPLYING THE TOPSIS METHOD TO CRISP AND INTERVAL DATA.

Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590

Santika, P. P., & Handika, I. P. S. (2019). SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PENERIMAAN KARYAWAN DENGAN METODE AHP TOPSIS (Studi Kasus: PT. Global Retailindo Pratama). SINTECH (Science and Information Technology) Journal, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.31598/sintechjournal.v2i1.321

Tafesse, W., & Wien, A. (2017). A framework for categorizing social media posts. Cogent Business & Management, 4(1), 1284390. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2017.1284390

Triantaphyllou, E., & Mann, S. H. (n.d.). USING THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR DECISION MAKING IN ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS: SOME CHALLENGES.

Vargas, L. G. (1990). An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90056-H

Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2011). MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING (MCDM) METHODS IN ECONOMICS: AN OVERVIEW / DAUGIATIKSLIAI SPRENDIMŲ PRIĖMIMO METODAI EKONOMIKOJE: APŽVALGA. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(2), 397–427. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.593291